It should be known that nobody questions the geek-cred of CyberD at The Wheel. One can scurry off to a dark stinky cave and pretend to know the difference between a Tavloid and a Tavlek, but here at The Wheel we know the score!
When it comes to debating the merits of Star Wars vs. Star Trek, the plot fallacy of a time paradox, or the life-long acting contribution of Warwick Davis, I am here to say that I can pop, drop, and lock it with the best of them!
If the realm of science fiction and fantasy entertainment was a runway than I am a coked up, anorexic, slightly bi-curious supermodel ready to strut her stuff!
7 comments:
"...than I am a coked up, anorexic, slightly bi-curious supermodel ready to strut her stuff!"
Sure, that's all fine and dandy, but who do YOU think would win between the Enterprise D and the Death Star?
Death Star.
Enterprise D isn't nearly maneuverable enough to fend off Tie fighters or fire a photon torpedo down a vent.
Reading geekiness this early in the morning for me clearly signals an awesome day ahead.
Well, since you put it that way...
papa, I I agree with Gyuss on the outcome but not on the premise. The Death Star would win because Enterprise D is large enough to be targeted by its super-laser. It would be over before it even started.
Gyuss, a dog fight with Tie fighters...? You are soooo main stream!
Susan, Geekiness in the morning is better than coffee.
Tera, that depends on what you're into...
I defy you and Gyuss, using transporter technology to beam over a photon torpedo into the Death Start, circumventing the need to shoot it down a vent, insures instant victory for the Federation. Also, the Enterprise D is too maneuverable for the super laser to lock onto, and if things ever got really bad the Federation could always call on Chuck Norris. :D
Papa, I hate to break it to you but the transporter technology from Star Trek is just pretend!
Post a Comment